Upper Page:

1. Freedom of Speech Dead, Persecution reigns
   1. Yellings Banning
      1. The Telegram paradox.
   2. General Banning
      1. If there is anyone that is left in any doubt that America has fallen into a Coup, see this:
      2. Even Presidents banned
   3. Gaslighting the world
      1. "YouTube - Supporting the 2020 U.S. election" (linked here) 11th, Dec, 2020
   4. For More, scroll below link tiles..

Lower Page

1. What planet is our illiberal media on?
   1. Rinsing the Media
   2. British Bias Corporation
   3. Is there an answer to MSM collusive behavior?
2. BBC Bias Closely Examined...
   1. BBC Fact Check
   2. Re BBC's Georgia election: Donald Trump's phone call fact-checked:
      1. 1. Article copied below with Rebuttals. BBC text is greyed..
   3. Claim 1: 'So dead people voted. And I think the number is close to 5,000 people [in Georgia].'
   4. Claim 2: '[There] were thousands and thousands of ballots in a box that was not an official or a sealed box.'
   5. Claim 3: 'They ran out because of a water-main break. And there was no water main, there was nothing. There was no break.'
   6. Claim 4: 'You had out-of-state voters - they voted in Georgia but they were from out of state - of 4,925.'
   7. in conclusion about the BBC
      1. Update 5th Jan
      2. More on BBC Bias

-

Freedom of Speech Dead, Persecution reigns

James O'Keefe's twitter account was suspended, so the twitter link/embed no longer works(4/18/2021)
The story is taken up by RT halfway down this article (with video)(here)

General Banning

If there is anyone that is left in any doubt that America has fallen into a Coup, see this:

1. Parler, free speech alternative to Twitter, ERASED FROM THE EARTH by Amazon (who were hosting them)
• The most egregious thing is Amazon, whom Parler presumably entrusted with the domain name Parler.com, are obviously holding the name hostage because it no longer resolves to anything. As any good web engineer will tell you, NEVER gift total control to one service provider. In other words, Parler is unable to even point their name to another server. So unless Parler is incompetent and has not reassigned parler.com, that's out and out THEFT by Amazon (or whoever controls the domain name).
  
2. YouTube removing any non-left-narrative (see below)
3. Facebook, Twitter - SILENT
   
4. MSM silent

Even Presidents banned

..the arrogance!

Gaslighting the world

"YouTube - Supporting the 2020 U.S. election" (linked here) 11th, Dec, 2020

That's not a fake title - YouTube wrote that. They announced (again, their words) "we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election". Main article here.
How can a public be informed if it's monopolized media is simply erasing stuff without reason or merit other than partisanship? Soon their parent company will be manipulating searches (if not already), and finally censoring internet activity itself (if not already).

For More, scroll below link tiles..

Links..
Lower Page:

1. What planet is our illiberal media on?
   1. Rinsing the Media
   2. British Bias Corporation
   3. Is there an answer to MSM collusive behavior?
2. BBC Bias Closely Examined...
   1. BBC Fact Check
   2. Re BBC's Georgia election: Donald Trump's phone call fact-checked:
      1. 1. Article copied below with Rebuttals. BBC text is greyed..
   3. Claim 1: 'So dead people voted. And I think the number is close to 5,000 people [in Georgia].'
   4. Claim 2: '[There] were thousands and thousands of ballots in a box that was not an official or a sealed box.'
   5. Claim 3: 'They ran out because of a water-main break. And there was no water main, there was nothing. There was no break.'
   6. Claim 4: 'You had out-of-state voters - they voted in Georgia but they were from out of state - of 4,925.'
   7. in conclusion about the BBC
      1. Update 5th Jan
      2. More on BBC Bias

-

What planet is our illiberal media on?

The most insidious thing the global mainstream media (MSM) did in 2020 was to bypass due process and prematurely call Biden the winner. Big Tech (Twitter & Facebook especially) then got in on the action by not just censoring, but completely removing any speech that did not fit the MSM narrative so that no one could even see there was an alternate point of view. This was later improved upon by simply adding a label to the effect that the statement was contested which became almost a "this is true" calling card for conservatives.

"Sidney Powell spoke with Lou Dobbs about the struggles this president is now facing after the stolen election was called by the liberal media." - GatewayPundit.

For example, the president, sitting POTUS Trump, not able to give a mountain of facts in a 250 letter tweet, was having aspersions cast on his character and his message constantly with these little "contested" labels. Think about just how arrogant it is to attempt to assert that a sitting president is a bit dim and cannot be trusted, and not only that but that the half of America who follow him are thus the same.

This brutal act of deception will now likely cause riots and pandemonium, possibly even a movement towards civil war. Not only in America, but also in other countries who have been similarly gaslighted and blighted by digital vote counting shenanigans.

Sidney Powell went on to opine her concerns about the entire establishment with her words (at the end of the interview linked above) "It affects the bedrock of our democratic republic.  It can't be allowed to stand and, frankly, I'm about to think the entire  FBI and the entire Department of Justice need to be hosed out with Clorox and firehoses."

Rinsing the Media

Should we be looking at the power of the media and diminishing it? Should we look for evidence of cartels and / or steerage by the elite giga-wealthy? Certainly a good place to start would be the Bilderberg Group and what has become known as the "Davos Cabal", but that is a whole new subject.

There is a precedent of Big Tech organizations being broken up - AT&T in 1984. Indeed, even left leaning NPR ask "Could The Old AT&T Break-Up Offer Lessons For Big Tech Today?" NPR naively states regulators are taking a close look at "whether they're monopolies" .. Well, that's the understatement of the year. Of course they are. By the very nature of things, user are going to use the best tools, and that will always make the first past the post bigger and better leaving the opposition underfunded and pushed out. There used to be something in the UK called the Monopolies and Mergers Commission - an organization that seems to have to have completely given up on Big Tech, especially Google. How ridiculous that the shop down the road has to pay a foreign corporation if he wants his customers, just a block away, to know he is hosting a wine and cheese evening?

The MSM is however different from Big Tech. They do seem to be fragmented into different entities already - so why do they all act as one?

British Bias Corporation

Even the BBC in the UK (British Broadcasting) has been dutifully towing the MSM line and calling Biden the President Elect, discussing his choices of cabinet, following his conversations with other world leaders, talking about the Biden's dogs in the White House (one of the best examples of gaslighting you will ever see as it subtly normalizes the, as yet uncertified, transition of power).

Even now, after weeks of USA legal battles, the viciously biased BBC is running a story titled Trump presidency's final days: 'In his mind, he will not have lost' in which a deeply offensive cartoon is displayed showing Trump as a boy surrounded by toy missiles with the inscription "Playtime is over Donny" and a pair of Jail overalls next to him. On what planet is that not discrediting POTUS, ignoring the ongoing contest and simply reeking of the most vile bias? Indeed, it is so unbelievable, we think they will likely change it and then pretend it never happened (as they often do) so we have kept a PDF image of the page and put it on the highly esteemed Way Back Machine otherwise known as https://archive.org/web/ whom we would encourage you to donate to.

Is there an answer to MSM collusive behavior?

We will conclude this article by saying "follow the money" but also by noting that there may be no particular collusion except that they all follow each other around like a snake eating it's own tail, buying into each other's liberal gaslighting, listening to their own echo chamber and creating an alternate reality of near-religious fervor.

For example, the BBC has been a leading light, running continuous stories daily on LGBT and BAME (Black And Minority Ethnics) issues. These people possibly need some support, but it is not for a tax payer funded organization to focus on them almost to the exclusion of the vast majority of struggling native Brits.

And this is where to rot starts. This BBC behavior is reinforced by legions of university liberals who join them, becoming part of the establishment, going back to feed universities as lecturers, nurturing liberals, and ultimately creating a social class divide.

It only takes a small hop from there to see how the BBC, along with the MSM, might nurture, quite possibly unintentionally (given the impenetrable nature of their echo chamber), perhaps the biggest fraud the earth has ever seen.

BBC Bias Closely Examined...

For our USA audience, we invite you to see parallels with your own MSM... CNN, ABC etc...  Whatever happened to just reporting the news? Their partisanship is staggering.

BBC Fact Check

As the old saying goes, who will police the police? In this case, who will fact check the fact checkers? Witness this story emerging on Jan 4th 2021..

Re BBC's Georgia election: Donald Trump's phone call fact-checked:

Article copied below with Rebuttals. BBC text is greyed..

US President Donald Trump spent more than an hour on the phone to election officials in Georgia, as he continues to try to overturn the result in the state.

He made a number of accusations of fraud for which he did not provide evidence.

We've fact-checked some of his claims.

Yellings rebuttals are inset and italicized..

Claim 1: 'So dead people voted. And I think the number is close to 5,000 people [in Georgia].'

President Trump and his supporters have repeatedly claimed thousands of votes were cast in states across the country, using the identities of people who had died.

But Georgia's top election official, Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, denied the president's assertion, saying there were just two confirmed cases of dead people voting in the state.

• Brad Raffensperger is a RINO. He doesn't like D T.
  It's hard to confirm evidence when truckloads of ballots are destroyed and the computer software that fictionalized the counts were and are still not under investigative control. The evidence of malpractice can be erased as quickly as it can be inserted.
• In addition, this claim of only 2 was strongly refuted by OAN - here (OAN is an infinitely more reputable news source than the BBC despite those saying it's not .. we know this because they tell you what is actually happening instead of hiding it)
  
• Case closed.

The president's lawyer Cleta Mitchell, also on the call, responded to this by suggesting they had details of dead people voting.

"There is a universe of people who have the same name and same birth year and died," she told Mr Raffensperger.

However, our previous investigation into a list of "10,000 dead voters" in Michigan found this approach seriously flawed.

Referring to other research on a different matter is also seriously flawed logic. It is certainly no better than the research behind DT's assertion which has involved several lawyers, mathematicians, statisticians.

Cross-referencing lists of deaths across the US and voters in a particular state produces thousands of matches - with the same name and birth year - both dead and alive.

Our study in Michigan produced a large number of matches even when the month of birth was included.

And we contacted a sample of these "dead voters" and found them very much alive.

And we have seen video of DT's investigators door knocking and find them very much non-existent.

Claim 2: '[There] were thousands and thousands of ballots in a box that was not an official or a sealed box.'

The president is referring to a video taken at a counting facility at the State Farm Arena, in Fulton County, Georgia, suggesting it reveals fraudulent activity by election workers.

The footage shows officials returning to their counting areas and a container with ballots being pulled out from under a table

"When they came back," Mr Trump said in his phone call, "they didn't go to their station.

"They went to the apron wrapped around the table, under which were thousands and thousands of ballots in a box that was not an official or a sealed box."

Election officials have previously responded to this accusation, saying the footage shows normal practice.

And you, BBC, believe that? IT IS ILLEGAL to have a table with an Apron around it, let alone a bunch of boxes under it. It is ALSO ILLEGAL to scan vote into machines without that process being monitored.

Gabriel Sterling, the voting system implementation manager in Georgia, tweeted state investigators who had watched the whole video had found nothing untoward.

BBC, if you walk up to a burglar and ask them if they burgled someone, what are they going to tell you?

An official investigation found "the entire security footage revealed there were no mystery ballots that were brought in from an unknown location and hidden under tables as has been reported by some".

No? Then what is on the video? Fairy dust?

Fulton County elections director Richard Barron said workers "put those ballot bins under their workspace because it's the most convenient place to put those things".

If I wanted to put something somewhere for convenience, it would not be under a shrouded table.

And state authorities said there was nothing unofficial about the boxes containing the ballots.

BBC, now you are just walking up to the getaway driver and hoping he will give you a different answer to the burglar you just asked. Here is the fact - no proper recount was done, and evidence has been seen to be destroyed. DT  has asked for the evidence they have remaining to be judged - it has been thrown out without even being looked at. 

Claim 3: 'They ran out because of a water-main break. And there was no water main, there was nothing. There was no break.'

Mr Trump is referring to a pause in the counting at the same location in Fulton County.

At the time, election officers issued a press statement saying a water leak had affected a room where absentee ballots were being tabulated.

An official investigation later clarified "what was initially reported as a water leak... was actually a urinal that had overflowed".

This information emerged several days later when it was conveniently no longer checkable and only after scrutiny showed neither evidence of damage, nor records of plumbers in attendance (to our knowledge) and, the urinal in question (used for the excuse) is said to be nowhere near the counting.

The report said this had not affected the counting of votes by Fulton County later that evening.

President Trump also said when election workers had returned "there were no Republican poll watchers - actually, there were no Democrat poll watchers".

This is true - but the official investigation found they had been neither asked to leave or prevented from returning.

You're joking now right? THE ENTIRE BUILDING WAS EVACUATED (or so we thought). There was NO GOOD REASON TO DO THAT so they fabricated 

Frances Watson, chief investigator for the Georgia secretary of state, said: "Nobody gave them any advice on what they should do.

"And it was still open for them or the public to come back in to view at whatever time they wanted to."

That's certainly not in line with the ample video evidence of aggressive man-handling and evicting of watchers.

Claim 4: 'You had out-of-state voters - they voted in Georgia but they were from out of state - of 4,925.'

Ryan Germany, a lawyer representing Georgia's secretary of state's office during the call, has rejected this claim.

Well well well... Let's either shadow ban or mock and discredit all Trump's legal team and believe someone no one has ever heard of.

"Every one we've been through are people that lived in Georgia, moved to a different state but then moved back to Georgia legitimately," he said.

The numbers given by Mr Trump's team regarding these supposed out-of-state voters were "not accurate", Mr Germany added.

That may be so, but all manner of stuff was going on, and you listen to this guy while senior attorney Rudy Giuliani is denied standing? This should be contested in court, not by a bunch of BBC hacks.

Speaking ahead of Tuesday's Senate run-off election in Georgia, Mr Raffensperger said "qualified Georgians and only Georgians are allowed to vote in our elections" and out-of-state voters would not be tolerated.

And he warned anyone attempting to game the system: "We will find you and we will prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law."

Pull the other one. The entire establishment is in on it. There have been cases of perpetrators being caught (all democrats for some reason), but not many!

--//--

in conclusion about the BBC

In short, we at Yellings find the BBC is simply part of the problem. Their fact checking is partisan if not amateurish.

Just the fact that Trump got more votes that EVER BEFORE and yet was somehow beaten by Biden (who hardly campaigned) should be the trumpet sound preceding the greatest story of our time.

This story of voter fraud has to be the biggest, juiciest story ever, but no, all the BBC do is the same as CNN etc .. either ignore it, stonewall it (like the Hunter Biden scandal) or investigate Trump and play the part of an attorney for his detractors and the enemies of the 70+ million American Voters.

It is left to small independent hacks such as ourselves to protect freedom of speech and find the truth.

Update 5th Jan

We have some support in our conclusions...
'No Crime There, Period': Alan Dershowitz Says Trump Phone Call Taken out of Context

More on BBC Bias

Not applicable to our friends in the USA perhaps, but certainly underlines the point of rubbish fact checking and bias - see here (half way down).

--//--