We use cookies to provide an improved user experience and make ourselves visible to searches. By continuing to use our website, you agree to their use. See ABOUT menu for more. Click here to Hide.
Yellings.com
Up Vote Contact About

Shocking Evidence of utter corruption at the highest of levels

A quick summary of what happened here as detailed in the 4 videos below:

NB: This is also covered on our landing page on Situation Update 10th Feb 2021
Image result for hand up

What is it about? We are 99% sure James Clapper, former Director of National Intelligence, is the infamous Lin Wood Whistleblower published here.

Why is this significant? The whistleblower implicates (allegedly) Child Trafficking surrounding senior judges, underworld activity by Pence, extraordinary false flag plots orchestrated by the Clinton's, techniques for controlling judges and politicians, etc.

Why did Lin Wood publish the Whistleblower? The original posts by Lin Wood have been buried behind thousands of tweets or removed with Parler and by Twitter, but many will be able to confirm Lin Wood definitely originally posted them to defend himself from being called crazy for suggesting Pence should go before a firing squad. This may still be find-able in his current Telegram feed (update - he again posted an extract here). At the time when Wood posted, we thought he was crazy too. We thought the whistleblower was an unhinged nobody as well. However, as the whistleblower is THAT SENIOR, we think it credible and frankly "mind blowing".

How did we come to this conclusion?
  1. We noticed someone posting James Clapper's "interrogations" in the first 2 videos,
  2. We confirmed it is James Clapper to the best of our ability by comparing the voice to video 3.
  3. then we twigged the famous Lin Wood whistleblower in video 4 was James Clapper
  4. We can see enough body language through the blur to add more weight to James Clapper being the Whistleblower.
  5. We since found precisely matching dialogue in the pixelated videos and videos 1 and 2 which are from an unknown source and of which the original poster seemed already certain it was James Clapper (as he states that in the video images).

What is the Conclusion? We ignored Putin when he said America was controlled by Pedophiles, we ignored him when he said he would start naming them if someone did not act (linked here and extract, translated and copied, at page bottom below) but that now adds even more credibility. Ie: it is possible Putin IS RIGHT.

Should we publish this conjectured information and conclusion? At first we were concerned about publishing this for Clapper's safety, but we are 99.999% certain the FBI and CIA already know exactly who the whistleblower is. If there is 1% chance it is not Clapper, they will know that and Clapper is safe. If it is Clapper, then it is probably safer for Clapper that we all know because it will make it more obvious who the culprits are if something happens to him. Indeed, the person in the video says this is why he became a whistle blower -- he feared for his family. Besides, we were not the first to publish.
Update 25th Jan 2021:

This is how it revealed itself.. You can see our astonishment:

Scroll down past Video 3 for EARTH SHATTERING possible Revelation
On initial assessment, this seems to bear out the conspiracy theories that they are all (Judges, politicians, etc) controlled. Indeed, Lin Wood who is an experienced and careful user of evidence and statements has been saying this. The videos mention in particular Jeffrey Epstein's "supply" of under age sex to the likes of Chief Justice John Roberts etc -- see caveat / disclaimer next.

For now, we are saying this is conjectured until we can get it verified that the voice is J Clapper and that we understand what he is saying - but note we have done some comparisons further below to satisfy ourselves at least that there is a very strong probability the voice is Clapper.

General James Clapper, ex Director National Intelligence:
We slowed it to 0.75% because we think the original we got from here was sped up.
It seems no one knows the original source (probably for fear of their lives|)
Interview 2 (we only have 2 & 5). Posted Jan 30 2021


Interview 5
We also slowed this to 0.75% as stated above -- the original is from here.


For Voice Comparison (to confirm this is James Clapper) -
We fast forwarded it to where he speaks about internet security
At 10:47 he starts to gabble briefly - which is very similar to how he speaks in thew interview prior.


How deep does this go? In this Aug 23, 2017 CNN clip here, (we don't recommend), you can see that Clapper has clearly been "gotten at" by the very cabal he exposes in the interviews above. His opinion of Trump is bordering on hysteria, even opining Trump might use the nuclear codes to take our Kim Jong Un (news flash - he made peace instead) -- this public vilification of Trump is at complete odds with all 3 videos above. He seems to hint that "knowing the levers a President can pull" that Trump could do such things - but we now know this is factually untrue -- he tried to reveal a corrupt election and was cornered, deplatformed and ridiculed. Indeed, hundreds of ex Military chiefs wrote open letters to him warning him. Tip: In August 2017, CNN hired Clapper as their national security analyst.[93]. This means CNN interviewed their own employee!!

EARTH SHATTERING possible Revelation
Remember our disclaimers at page top
IS THIS (Lin Wood's famously posted whistleblower witness tape) THE SAME PERSON????

The voice is very similar. The mannerisms are similar, especially the way he looks away as he thinks then turns back for eye contact -- same as our Youtube video. At 1:50 (in this blurred double pixelated video), we see him sit quite far forward to adjust his seating position -- exactly as we see him doing in the Clapper Video prior. Even the Interviewers Voice is the SAME!
Here's the blurred video just above put through the same sub-quality audio filters. Sounds extremely similar.
Here's an extended version of the blurred video, better quality. Includes a plot by Roberts to kill at 4:43.

Update -- Youtube video here starting 13:38 (we kept a copy of course) and
is IDENTICAL to our first video above starting at 10s.
We copied the complete transcript (auto generated by youtube) below
My God.
--//--



The following are selected picks of evidence that probably isn't admissible in court, but the shear volume of it speaks!
-

Complete Transcript of 5th Video (link)

As auto generated by youtube..
00:00    i started working directly with rob
00:04
rosenstein in baltimore
00:08
and uh because of the access many other
00:11
agencies
00:12
fbi for instance would come for
00:16
corroboration of something they were
00:18
working on or
00:20
just to ask questions if i'd seen
00:22
something like this if this related to
00:23
anything
00:24
and it grew from there epstein and
00:28
supreme court justice roberts initially
00:31
would have met
00:32
or how that relationship would have
00:33
developed
00:38
uh i think he met when he was under bush
00:41
not too long after he was
00:45
appointed somewhere along there just a
00:48
basic
00:49
meeting powerful people something like
00:51
that he did help him
00:52
with his adopted children from what
00:56
was said there and what was you know
00:59
discussed openly
01:00
in this little dirty trick squad the
01:03
children
01:04
are not genetically brother and sister
01:06
but they're raised that way
01:07
so that's more valuable to them
01:11
one if not both were originally from
01:13
wales but they were in the epstein
01:15
channels and were
01:16
easily removed from their version of
01:18
foster care to ireland which has
01:21
much more open adoption type records
01:25
and he facilitated this for a robber so
01:27
he could adopt them both at the same
01:29
time
01:30
there's a little gap but it was just
01:32
paperwork and that was him
01:33
uh i've seen it done that for him so
01:38
they they admit they'd work out and he
01:40
was doing favors at some point
01:42
was this something uh the supreme court
01:44
justice roberts would have paid for
01:46
or is this a you know a favor exchange
01:48
to epstein
01:49
to link with up with these children or
01:52
well i don't know at that point
01:53
it's possible to be either one i don't
01:55
think there would be a pain at that
01:56
point it's more for his position there
01:57
would be something in fact a favor
01:59
but i don't know either one of those
02:01
done he facilitated it
02:04
was their payment was it favor i can't
02:05
say okay
02:07
uh can you can you go into any more
02:09
details
02:10
on supreme court justice roberts with
02:13
these children in the circles that he
02:15
ran in
02:16
as far as you're aware
02:19
children are often used as a commodity a
02:21
way to buy yourself into
02:24
certain inner circles and these people
02:26
are all wealthy they're all powerful
02:28
and they won't trust you unless you're
02:30
as compromised as they are
02:33
so you you provide children to them
02:36
your children adopt your children
02:37
whatever this is how they trust you
02:39
you're as dirty as they are
02:41
you cannot be exposed because you can't
02:44
expose them
02:44
they can't expose you if everybody's
02:47
just a 30 you know you're safe
02:50
and they said this is a way for them to
02:51
buy their way into these inner circles
02:53
and get access to whatever
02:56
the children are the payment and the
02:59
dirt and the control
03:01
now who else would we want to talk to or
03:04
is there any
03:04
additional documentation that we could
03:07
pursue
03:09
to solidify what you're saying here
03:11
today
03:13
the fbi has copies of the videos from
03:15
the isis rounds
03:19
it was discussed but i can't prove it
03:20
that roberts had a copy
03:22
uh rob rosenstein certainly has a copy
03:25
uh sean henry of crown strike who was
03:27
fbi at the time
03:28
uh he took two copies back to the fbi
03:31
with him
03:32
so the copies were made and then that
03:35
was actually sean bridges who encrypted
03:37
them
03:37
and gave them the keys so there are
03:40
copies out there
03:42
and who would be on these tapes most
03:44
likely
03:45
as far as from your conversations in the
03:47
trick squad
03:48
from uh from just those tapes i was
03:50
talking about the copies
03:52
that would be roberts or excuse me uh
03:55
those would be pence and his
03:58
two lovers and the younger ones uh they
04:01
were also
04:02
um they would do the same thing uh
04:04
illegal surveillance or
04:06
sometimes advice but this was mostly in
04:07
the country illegal surveillance with
04:09
robert's children and whoever they were
04:12
with they'd set it up
04:15
they knew that they weren't going to be
04:16
exposed because these justice roberts
04:18
children
04:20
and please keep in mind that these
04:22
children have been abused since birth
04:24
and i don't want anything else happening
04:28
they've already lived through hell they
04:30
don't need anything else
04:31
but they were again loaned out for these
04:33
different groups and they didn't surveil
04:36
many of them okay
04:39
now you also have said in past in past
04:42
discussions
04:43
that there was a a plot
04:47
that roberts was allegedly a part of
04:50
where they discussed murdering other
04:53
judges
04:54
on the supreme court under a hillary
04:56
clinton administration can you give me
04:58
something to find details on that this
05:01
is something the fbi has set up
05:02
under their guidance from the
05:06
political people going to be a false
05:08
flag this has gone out
05:12
two years almost before the election
05:15
and it was a uh a sovereign citizen
05:16
group obama did not want any
05:18
terrorism unless it was white terrorism
05:21
so this is a sovereign citizen group
05:22
that the fbi had
05:24
infiltrated and armed and
05:27
instigated against other targets they
05:30
were for the most part
05:32
uh pro-america but they were racist in
05:34
some of their oregon
05:36
origins they were a lot of them were
05:39
divorced fathers with a grudge against
05:41
the court system anyway and the fbi
05:43
people had infiltrated and exploited
05:44
this
05:45
they moved him up to the level of
05:47
assassinating federal judges
05:50
political people things like that
05:53
you know what the names i can i can tell
05:55
you so anyway uh part of their plot was
05:58
um various types of attacks on the
06:01
supreme court
06:02
to take as many judges as they could
06:06
roberts was aware of this he actually
06:08
provided
06:09
some scheduling so apparently the
06:11
justices are not all there one time to
06:13
come and go as they please
06:15
and these three will be working on some
06:17
of these three and he provided this to
06:20
the group so they could finalize their
06:22
plans they were very very close
06:24
in what they were trying to do they were
06:27
given explosives
06:28
all types of automatic weapons they had
06:31
rocket launchers
06:33
and they were very close to it they were
06:36
going to
06:37
assassinate after the sailors federal
06:40
judge massachusetts martha coakley
06:42
uh lisa monaco and her family everybody
06:45
make that look like a home invasion and
06:47
film it until later when they needed it
06:50
and this was their initial attack plan
06:52
and then
06:53
the supreme court this was a group by an
06:55
infiltrator
06:56
on their request and when i found out
07:00
what they were doing that they were
07:01
going to attack these judges when they
07:02
were going to attack the supreme court
07:05
i tried to end around them i had minors
07:07
people kept tabs on me
07:09
i had fbi miners but i tried to
07:12
interrupt them and expose it
07:14
and i took all the evidence i went to
07:16
homeland security
07:18
who were overwhelmed and
07:22
called in the fbi and then the doj was
07:25
came right back on me and they
07:26
picked me up just a few weeks later
07:30
when they found out who i was and uh but
07:33
the damage to their plots had been done
07:36
they did uh
07:38
get close to assassinated people up
07:39
there mr monaco
07:41
the judge were under 24 7 security
07:44
martha coakley had in-state security
07:48
and it did prevent them from going after
07:50
the supreme court although
07:51
their plans were all out they had maps
07:53
they had the weapons they had everything
07:54
planned
07:54
so at least it prevented something like
07:56
that now were the teams that were
07:58
supposed to do the actual operations
07:59
against the judges
08:01
were those americans or were they
08:05
foreign
08:06
a third would be the sovereign citizen
08:09
group and
08:10
two thirds of the fbi people or people
08:12
working with the fbi
08:15
uh they uh they were going to get rid of
08:17
them anyway they actually had recordings
08:19
of
08:20
their planning on the phone with me as
08:22
part of this group
08:23
and then they did not hang up the phone
08:26
they
08:27
did not kill the phone and uh they were
08:29
listening to them talking about killing
08:30
me and my wife
08:32
things like that and another time they
08:34
actually butt died on me
08:36
and were talking about he was on the
08:37
phone talking to various people
08:39
and about their plans about who they're
08:41
going after
08:42
and what they want to do to us because
08:43
we do too much and we were outside
08:45
at the time so uh they
08:49
could not do their plan again we got the
08:51
people under surveillance
08:52
we saved them through credit for saving
08:54
them
08:56
they were very upset that their plans
08:58
had gone the crab were very upset with
09:00
me
09:00
especially when they came and picked me
09:02
up
09:03
but it stopped it their plans were
09:06
written out they were
09:06
like they had maps they had surveillance
09:08
they had quite a bit of equipment what
09:10
was the timeline that they were hoping
09:12
to do this
09:12
and this would be right after within the
09:16
first year of hillary clinton's
09:18
presidency she was not supposed to
09:21
so this was all planned up and it was it
09:24
was more
09:25
than just that it was it was twofold
09:26
they wanted to pack the court
09:28
uh they'd take out as many as they could
09:30
uh roberts was actually helping because
09:32
he didn't want to be
09:33
one of them and he wanted some uh choice
09:36
and who would be on the bench after that
09:37
he wanted to maintain some form of
09:39
control
09:41
so he did provide information but uh
09:44
it was supposed to be done within first
09:46
year hillary clinton's campaign so that
09:47
they could
09:48
ban firearms as well but uh impact court
09:51
so they'd have plenty of time to do that
09:53
that was their two main goals do you
09:56
believe the death of uh
09:58
anton scalia was a part of this same
10:01
plot or is that
10:02
do you know if that was a separate uh
10:04
it's the same people
10:05
he was a back-up plan he was their
10:08
biggest threat
10:09
being the most conservative justice
10:12
uh and justice scalia uh
10:15
actually i believe he found out about
10:17
this the plans and he went to the white
10:19
house
10:20
like a week before his death i believe
10:21
he found out what they were trying to do
10:23
when they moved away from the overall
10:26
attack
10:27
of where these people lived or you know
10:29
they would attack around the holidays
10:30
with more than one justice would be in
10:32
their home
10:32
things like this and again roberts was
10:36
providing this
10:37
but they had to take him out he was seen
10:39
as their biggest obstacle
10:41
so the same basic group that was
10:43
involved
10:45
were given access to the ranch where he
10:48
was found
10:50
they talked about how they did it they
10:52
had a couple different options but it
10:53
was discussed
10:54
prior to his death what they intended to
10:56
do where they could possibly do it
10:58
how they could do it who they would need
11:02
uh the records are there at the uh cebu
11:05
ranch
11:06
uh one person was brought in there's
11:09
three men
11:10
one person was brought in as a tent
11:12
worker
11:13
the other two same team were brought in
11:16
as
11:16
servants from a group that was there
11:18
hunting
11:20
and they discussed how it was done
11:23
that they used doom so the methyl
11:25
suboxide
11:26
which is a fairly inert chemical just
11:28
goes through your skin
11:30
but if you mix it with a poison or a
11:32
drug or something like that it'll go
11:33
directly in your system and overload you
11:36
i believe that's why he was found with a
11:37
pillow over his face he was struggling
11:38
to breathe
11:39
he couldn't breathe choking and this
11:42
particular chemical you can
11:44
tailor to the person if they have a drug
11:46
problem you can put
11:47
fentanyl in it and overdose them if they
11:49
have a heart condition
11:50
that take very little to go directly and
11:52
be like a direct injection into the
11:54
heart
11:56
then they they talked about how they did
11:59
it and roberts is on the phone
12:01
uh with these people discussing the uh
12:05
successor and he wanted to say in it
12:07
because now it was only going to be one
12:08
person he wanted to pick that person
12:11
and he wanted to say and who was going
12:13
to take it and of course there was a lot
12:14
of people that were talking about eric
12:15
holder taking it all kinds of people
12:17
but he wanted to say and who was going
12:20
to take over
12:21
justice scalia's
12:25
and uh i don't think he got it i mean
12:28
obviously it didn't happen because
12:29
president trump was here
12:31
but uh he did want it and this was all
12:33
prior the discussions and him
12:35
complaining that he wasn't getting any
12:37
say prior to his death his
12:38
son death so it was well done
12:42
so aside from the aside from roberts
12:44
being waiting on this
12:46
did rosenstein or anyone outside of the
12:49
white house
12:49
had they been made aware of the plans
12:52
perhaps in hillary's camp that you could
12:54
speak about
12:56
well hillary knew about it i mean it was
12:58
supposed to be done under her
13:00
watch her first term so that they could
13:02
pack the court i started working
13:03
directly with rob rosenstein and
13:05
baltimore
13:08
and because of the access many other
13:11
agencies
13:12
fbi for instance would come for
13:16
corroboration of something they were
13:18
working on or
13:20
just to ask questions if i'd seen
13:22
something like this if it's related to
13:23
anything
13:24
and it grew from there because of the
13:27
undercover nature of many of the
13:29
investigations i worked on terrorists or
13:32
things like that uh domestic terrorism
13:34
within the country
13:36
they kept me fairly well concealed and
13:39
access was limited to a certain group
13:41
headed by ron rosenstein it's became
13:44
known as
13:45
the dirty trick squad in baltimore this
13:47
is where they were using hammer
13:49
sunrise sunset things like that to
13:52
illegally spy on people corrupt
13:57
attempted corrupt judges compromise them
14:01
hillary clinton others i mean it was
14:04
just
14:04
ongoing they concentrated on judges but
14:06
they wanted to concentrate on this
14:09
there's done under the guise of a
14:10
c-steps operation it's a doj c-seps
14:13
computer operation
14:14
it was run out of fort washington but i
14:15
have satellite location in baltimore
14:18
and it would illegally compromise people
14:21
illegally wiretap
14:22
break into computers plant reverse
14:25
change information
14:26
change emails things that nature and it
14:30
was in this capacity of working with
14:32
them
14:33
that the information about the judges
14:36
and
14:37
roberts and pence and things like that
14:39
have come out
14:41
i've tried several times in the past to
14:45
get it out and was thoroughly
14:46
squashed by rod and the doj and the fbi
14:50
uh to a horrible extent i tried to get
14:52
in 2015
14:54
tried to end run them and go to the
14:56
department homeland security
14:59
and once it got i went there with a pile
15:02
of evidence and some
15:03
video and audio recordings it got
15:07
too large for him i suppose but it made
15:08
its way back to the fbi and doj and they
15:10
came down to us again
15:13
this was uh 2015
15:16
and in 2016 uh i made a video
15:19
discussing quite a bit of this and an
15:22
effort to get it
15:23
to devin nunez was the head of the house
15:26
intelligence committee at the time but
15:27
there was interference from all the
15:29
people involved
15:30
he messed that all up so it went largely
15:32
unnoticed
15:34
but on the video i tried to warn
15:38
president trump about the people that he
15:39
was dealing with daily and especially
15:41
rob
15:42
and things like that as they were
15:43
working together to remove them
15:45
trying to compromise the people around
15:47
them get dirty on anyone they possibly
15:49
could
15:50
howard rod and rob rosenstein and mike
15:54
pence connected
15:57
that group i mean they're all
15:58
interconnected in one way or another
16:00
that particular group
16:00
was rod vp pence
16:04
paul ryan uh that was the
16:08
core of that group robert's been there
16:10
but
16:11
that was the core of it and it was an
16:12
attempt where ron was the brilliant
16:15
legal mind behind it to remove
16:16
president trump under the 25th amendment
16:20
the uh they actually had an operational
16:21
name for the beginning uh
16:23
runs silent run deep but nobody really
16:25
used it after a while
16:26
that didn't make any sense because of
16:28
such a small group
16:30
but that was a that's an old movie about
16:32
somebody being passed over for promotion
16:33
which they both felt they were
16:35
you know vp pence hated
16:38
president trump because he had taken his
16:41
slot as
16:42
rightful president he felt that he did
16:45
and paul ryan was actually considered
16:47
running as well
16:48
for vice presidential slot and mitt
16:50
romney who was also involved
16:53
but they don't they thought president
16:55
trump was an outsider had not paid his
16:57
dues they just didn't like him
16:59
so once bp pence was uh
17:03
in there once president trump was
17:04
elected obviously vice president pence
17:07
i just walked away and everything became
17:09
very quiet that was their mole inside
17:11
someone who could run interference leak
17:13
certain things
17:14
and just keep tabs on the president
17:16
manage him so was this
17:18
a friendly relationship between mike
17:20
pence and rosenstein or was there any
17:22
kind of
17:23
leverage being placed on the president
17:24
or the vice president at the time
17:27
there was leverage on mike pence
17:30
because of uh surveillance from way back
17:33
in the
17:35
2013 range
17:37
that they had gotten faison warrants to
17:41
exploit and rod had that he wanted the
17:44
vice presidential slot himself
17:47
if they could remove president trump
17:50
vice president pence becomes president
17:52
then roth felt that
17:53
he would be the natural selection for
17:55
paul ryan felt differently
17:57
as did mitt romney but that was the
18:00
overall goal each one i'm buying for
18:04
the vice presidential slot rob thought
18:06
he was the clear winner because of his
18:08
legal brilliance and his management of
18:11
the mueller investigation and special
18:13
counsels and things
18:15
you know he would be the one to remove
18:16
the president
18:18
damaging him so thoroughly he could be
18:19
removed and he deserved it
18:24
do you know what type of leverage would
18:27
have existed
18:28
over the vice president uh the vice
18:30
president has had
18:31
uh homosexual relations in the past
18:34
it's not a problem uh the uh many of
18:37
them were adults
18:39
this is something he had done throughout
18:42
his time in
18:43
congress when he became governor
18:47
he felt that he was free to explore them
18:49
more
18:50
there were two specifically that they
18:52
had recorded
18:54
one gentleman roughly 20 years his
18:56
junior yeah they had a
18:58
fairly steady relationship there was one
19:00
about half his age
19:02
it was much more sporadic uh it's
19:04
considered because it was more dangerous
19:05
harder getting you know time alone
19:08
this person would introduce others he'd
19:10
bring people with him he'd have people
19:11
waiting when he showed up
19:13
and it was that second one that
19:15
introduced younger younger people this
19:17
is
19:18
whomever he's 17. he's probably 15. he's
19:20
remember he's 15 he's really 13.
19:24
and rod and
19:28
roberts the chief justice roberts
19:33
a lot of the younger people involved the
19:34
ones that were brought
19:37
as uh favors were uh
19:40
supplied by uh jeffrey epstein's uh
19:43
channels through his channels
19:44
his people they were able to get uh fisa
19:47
warrants
19:47
because one of course chief justice
19:49
robson had vice court
19:51
help them prepare them but it was also
19:55
epstein was an intelligence asset
19:58
sometimes
19:59
to various agencies around the world
20:01
they used his information they
20:03
exploited it for their own good so when
20:05
he was here or his people were here it
20:07
was easy enough to
20:08
justify a fisa warrant on them you know
20:11
i would
20:12
enact the warrant surveil everything
20:14
document it but they would not
20:16
help anyone they would not save the
20:17
child they would not
20:19
you know reveal it was more important
20:21
than having leverage on everything
20:23
of course this is under their own
20:25
corrupt ideas but
20:26
under rod his tutelage
20:30
and they wanted the leverage
20:34
all right so i'm going to ask you
20:37
if we could get into some more of the
20:39
details
20:41
with the dirty trick squad and how
20:43
rosent rosenstein
20:45
was a part of that group and if roberts
20:47
had any type of
20:49
interaction with the group as well
20:52
during shake squad it was just a
20:53
nickname certainly wasn't anything
20:54
official
20:56
this group of people that were either
20:57
dirty or they controlled i was when i
20:59
was controlled
21:02
uh there was rod uh sean henry fbi
21:06
uh sean bridges secret service
21:10
rosati joseph razani who was the va
21:13