We use cookies to provide an improved user experience and make ourselves visible to searches. By continuing to use our website, you agree to their use. See ABOUT menu for more. Click here to Hide.
Yellings.com
Up Vote Contact About Search

Mike Lindell's 1hr "Absolute Interference" evidence video ..

Mike Lindell's 1hr "Scientific Proof" evidence video ..

=
=
Mike Lindell's 2hr "Absolute Proof" evidence video ..
...


..within minutes of posting, Vimeo AND Youtube deleted it! (UK servers here so that won't happen).
All rights belong to Mike. We share it here as we think he wants us to.

 
And Now, in Hi Def - "UNMASKED"!

Essential Viewing! A very well researched, cited, fast paced and concise video with great evidence,
perfectly complementing our data and Lindell's video above. Our Comment: America, we've got this here.

We can corroborate much of it from our own experience. With the Lindell ''Proof'', it becomes compelling if not overwhelming evidence.

x see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evilx

About the "Evidence":

From hard exhibits to opinion..

Notwithstanding our disclaimers under "about", we would prefer to present this information as exhibits rather than evidence. That's simply because so many are confusing proof with evidence. "Evidence" isn't only confined to irrefutable evidence -- but more on that below.

We attest that the shear volume of evidence, perhaps of varying quality, is a form of evidence in itself. Nonetheless, we have attempted to grade these exhibits from evidence to conjecture, and finally opinion (based on observations), and to stretch laterally to counter-evidence (included for understanding) and finally, Analysis.

How amazing that you see virtually none of this in the MSM?

What is "Evidence"?

In any event, there seems to be an increasing misinterpretation in the MSM of the word "evidence" itself. When the MSM claimed Trump's legal team was putting forward allegations without "evidence", that was an obvious falsehood albeit more likely from ignorance. What I suspect they meant was the team was putting forward allegations without "proof", which they seemed to think all evidence should be tested against before it can be even considered "evidence". As proof is as judged in the courts, and as it is common to start a court case without all the evidence neatly tied down, then the teams were within their rights.

The point is that we too are not putting things here as hard proof or even especially hard evidence. It just is what it is - exhibits of observations as repeated through the imperfect press.

One thing I would be sure of - we can and must be at least able to discuss it unless it is truly egregious or obviously a falsehood.

This is an archive of our selected articles for our landing page Breaking News picks..
All original and/or non-cited material in Yellings.com is copyright and, for avoidance of doubt, should be assumed to be fictional. Our linking to external sources is not an endorsement. See About menu for more information. Thank you!